Judge denies marriage annulment of separated couple on wedding day

0

After the ceremony, they went to a local park to take wedding photos, but a serious argument broke out between them, in the presence of family members.

Content of the article

A judge refused to grant an annulment of the marriage of a couple who broke up over an argument on their wedding day.

Content of the article

Ameen Grewal and Amarjot Singh Bal tied the knot in a wedding ceremony in Richmond on August 20.

After the ceremony, they went to a local park to take wedding photos, but a serious argument broke out between them, in the presence of family members, according to affidavits filed in court.

In his ruling on the case, BC Supreme Court Justice Frits Verhoeven said it was not necessary for him to recite the details of the dispute.

Grewal became “very upset,” immediately left the park and abandoned the rest of the wedding activities, telling Bal she didn’t want the wedding to continue.

Rather than asking for a divorce, the couple asked the court for a declaration of nullity of the marriage.

The request was for an annulment by way of a so-called administrative order – an order made by the judge after the supporting documents were filed and without a hearing of any kind.

Content of the article

But the judge concluded that it was not appropriate for the application to proceed in this manner and added that the documents filed did not justify an annulment.

Verhoeven said there was no evidence to support the conclusion that the marriage was void.

“There is no evidence to suggest that the parties were not able to marry, or that their consent to the marriage was invalid, or that the wedding ceremony itself did not meet formal requirements under marriage law, ”said the judge.

“In fact, the evidence they brought shows exactly the opposite. There is a presumption of valid marriage with consent if the marriage ceremony has followed the required formalities. “

The judge noted that divorce orders are usually granted in the form of administrative orders, with the evidentiary and procedural requirements for the order being fairly clear.

“However, given the factual findings required to render a judgment annulling a marriage, I suggest that an application for an administrative order annulling a marriage is almost certainly doomed,” he said.

“Therefore, the most appropriate practice would be to bring an action and have a trial, or perhaps a summary trial. Requests for annulment by administrative order are likely to be a waste of time and money for the parties, as well as a waste of judicial resources, as in this case.

[email protected]

twitter.com/keithrfraser



Source link

Share.

Leave A Reply